Originally by: Yorda

---

• 2 gun slots 100% damage role bonus


• 5% shield boost amount instead of missile RoF


• 3/6/5


• +15% cpu

There I did your job for you.

---

Originally by: CCP Abathur

---

Edited by: CCP Abathur on 01/05/2009 11:08:48


Just to reiterate:

Originally by: CCP Chronotis

---

At this point, we are gathering feedback and nothing is set in stone at all. As mentioned at the start, we realize that there are more fundamental issues with dreadnoughts and specific focuses on their anti-capital ship abilities.

Feedback is most welcome!

---

We are following this thread. Several of the ideas suggested here mirror discussions the dev team has had in the office, out of the office, over beer, etc... It's good to know that many of our thoughts mirror your own. Yes, we've also considered a 'Marauder'-like bonus to the guns, changing slot layouts and a variety of other things to achieve a good end result. However, we do not just look at the numbers and make a decision; we adjust the ships on our internal development server and play test them. This takes time, and it is time well spent as we often find that something awesome in theory is horrid in reality. There have been a lot of tweaks and play testing done over the past few days and we want to make sure whatever fix is implemented is one that provides the most balance possible.

Fixing the Naglfar is part of a broader look at capitals in general that goes beyond just making sure their current incarnations are balanced. Upcoming features that we want to implement such as Jump Fuel Bays and looking into the usefulness (or lack thereof) of current short range Dread weaponry are being taken into account as well.

Changes will not appear overnight, but we are working on it. We understand that some of you have very strong emotions about this, but please try to keep your comments constructive and helpful. Thank you!

---

Originally by: DigitalCommunist

---

Stuff

---

Originally by: 1600 RT

---

Originally by: Ecky X

---

Originally by: To mare

---

it a bit lacking on che CPU side so while you are at it a +170 instead of a +150 would be perfect just to avoid future whinage on its cpu.

---

Sounds right. Using faction boost amps and a named damage control, I'm still 165 CPU short. To fit T2 boost amps you need a 5% CPU implant.

[Naglfar, New Setup 1]
Internal Force Field Array I
Ballistic Control System II
Ballistic Control System II
Gyrostabilizer II
Gyrostabilizer II
Beta Reactor Control: Capacitor Power Relay I

Capital Shield Booster I
Domination Shield Boost Amplifier
Domination Shield Boost Amplifier
Invulnerability Field II
Invulnerability Field II
F-90 Positional Sensor Subroutines

Quad 3500mm Siege Artillery I, EMP XL
Quad 3500mm Siege Artillery I, EMP XL
Citadel Torpedo Launcher I, Thor Torpedo I
Citadel Torpedo Launcher I, Thor Torpedo I
Siege Module I

[empty rig slot]
[empty rig slot]
[empty rig slot]

---

2 ballistic control system on unbonused torp sound wrong to me
this is what i came up with a fast eft warrioring session:

Damage Control II
Gyrostabilizer II
Gyrostabilizer II
Gyrostabilizer II
Capacitor Power Relay II
Capacitor Power Relay II

Capital Shield Booster I
Invulnerability Field II
Invulnerability Field II
Shield Boost Amplifier II
Shield Boost Amplifier II
Sensor Booster II

Quad 3500mm Siege Artillery I,EMP XL
Quad 3500mm Siege Artillery I,EMP XL
Citadel Torpedo Launcher I,Thor Torpedo I
Citadel Torpedo Launcher I,Thor Torpedo I
Siege Module I
Capacitor Control Circuit I
Capacitor Control Circuit I
Capacitor Control Circuit I

this fit require 1070 CPU new nag will have 1062.5, could replace a boost amp for another hardener and make everything fit.
its ok just a bit tight +20 base CPU would make it perfect allowing to replace those 2 CPR with 2 PDS for less cap stability but more ehp and burst tank.

---